Because this is such a long and drawn out paragraph with many questions, I'm going to take this one at a time:
Now before you go off accusing me yet again of "skewering things", consider your paragraph. I have no idea what the intent of this is because you don't explain why you feel a mother's expectations in this instance are paramount. You yourself have to agree that you are not known for detailed and thought provoking thoughts put into words. Instead you do quite the opposite. You load the post with a bunch of questions, then turn around and accuse others of not answering them.
When answers come and they don't suit you, you start bolding, calling names and doing your usual bullying so one of your other accomplices will chime in and acknowledge how useful calling names and insulting others can be. That's you in about 95% of your posts. Read them.
You call me out about my methods as you see them? Well, surprise, surprise, you're just as predictable. Strange for a person who says he was so involved in debates.
I answered the question based on the small bit of information I had. In other words, my expectations of Nick or any other son are of no bearing.
It's not skewering, it's what I think. But yet because it doesn't suit you, you get all puffed up and start hurling the accusations of skewering.
It's funny, I thought all opinions were acceptable here, not just what you want to read.
Quote:Are you capable of being objectively at all, as a mother? For one minute put yourself in place of being Nicks mom, not Kelly or a Grimm. Just his plain mom, and you know what has happened in his life, just to name a few.
Now before you go off accusing me yet again of "skewering things", consider your paragraph. I have no idea what the intent of this is because you don't explain why you feel a mother's expectations in this instance are paramount. You yourself have to agree that you are not known for detailed and thought provoking thoughts put into words. Instead you do quite the opposite. You load the post with a bunch of questions, then turn around and accuse others of not answering them.
When answers come and they don't suit you, you start bolding, calling names and doing your usual bullying so one of your other accomplices will chime in and acknowledge how useful calling names and insulting others can be. That's you in about 95% of your posts. Read them.
You call me out about my methods as you see them? Well, surprise, surprise, you're just as predictable. Strange for a person who says he was so involved in debates.
I answered the question based on the small bit of information I had. In other words, my expectations of Nick or any other son are of no bearing.
It's not skewering, it's what I think. But yet because it doesn't suit you, you get all puffed up and start hurling the accusations of skewering.
It's funny, I thought all opinions were acceptable here, not just what you want to read.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.