04-17-2018, 03:24 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-17-2018, 03:39 AM by dicappatore.)
(04-16-2018, 10:20 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:When Nick goes down for your so called "Loving Kiss" she is not in the "Hag Look'.I never said loving kiss. I did not even say it was a kiss. Nick proving it was him said it was a kiss. Second it was not the kiss of bite or what ever it was that I was referring to. I was referring to Nick having her pinned on the ground , was looking directly into her woged face. showing he was not repulsed. He was moving towards her before she un woged. What funny is you say it is made by using things I did not even say. there is now where that you can quote that I said loving kiss. You can not even quote that I said they kissed. I said Nick said it was their first kiss. A big difference.
As for How children address a step parent. Age is a consideration. But the biggest thing is the relationship they have with the other parent. If the other parent stays prominent in the child's life. That is who they refer to as their dad or mom. What you are not considering is in the past the other parent would become an absent parent. This had a lot to due with judges feeling that it would be disruptive for the other parent to be around. Now days judges are awarding joint custody. Meaning the other parent can stay very active in the child's life.
Quote:Its not left ambigous you just refuse to accept ho wthe show ended the writers have siad in two interview Nick and Adaling are still togther in the end.You answered you own question. the question was asked if Nick and Adalind are still together. The writers answered that fair. That is not definitive. That is saying if you see it as them still together then the show supports that theory. But that does not eliminate other theories. That is what is meant by ambiguous. There are multiple valid theories. Unlike your statement of Diana could be Eric's we know Adalind sleep with Eric but that would not be a fair assumption.
Look at the other interviews they did. You will notice they never give a definitive answer. If you notice they will agree with a theory even if it contradicts a previous question. Take the question about Juliette being dead. Every plausible theory got where acknowledged as being a fair assumption. The other question that was put forth with multiple theories was did they all die or did Nick just think they all died. Both theories received a positive acknowledgement of being a fair way of seeing it. there where other times people came up with theories where the Writers commented that is a good idea wish we had thought of it.
Hey, the "Loving Kiss" reference is meant to be sarcasm since you and one or two other consider what Nick did as cheating. Not only YOU have pointed it out but others. The sarcasm refers to you people calling that kiss cheating. Did I put that in your mouth? Nick is a Grimm, he isn't disgusted at fighting a Hex, He isn't there to make out. More FACTS, you seem to overlook. Was Nick there to make out with her? Was he there to have sex with her? or was he there to kill her Hex, without killing the person? Please tell me, What was he there for? What was he looking to accomplish, with your great "writers intent" intuition. Better yet, don't tell me, tell yourself, since you are completely confused.
You claim to be in tune with "writers intent" yet you can distinguish a fight between Nick, a Grimm and Adalind a Hex even if she was voge and she wasn't when he went for the lips, compared to Juliette, a Hex asking Nick to kiss her Hag look. He is a Grimm, Grimms do not get repulsed when fighting a Hex. You can squawk about it all you want. Just because you do not re-post what you type doesn't go away.
(04-15-2018, 06:40 PM)syscrash Wrote: Here is another point. Nick had Adalind pinned to the ground while she was in full woge. That was when he acted like he was going to kiss her and she bit his lip after un woging. He was not repulsed by Adalinds woge.
Just read what you posted. Well which is it, did he put his lips on her lips when she was in voge or when she un-voged. How can he be repulsed about kissing her in voge when you just admitted it she wasn't. Is pinning her down the same as putting his lips on hers? Well Is It?? Make up your frekin mind. This is what you do, you conflict with yourself and aren't able to see it.
Nick wasn't repulsed from Juliette just because she was a Hex. He was repulsed because she was a Hex that was still the love of his life. If you aren't able to distinguish the differences between one Hex, Juliette, and Nick in season 4, compared to his relationship with the Hex Adalind in season 1 and how they relate to each other, I can not help you. Obviously we were NOT watching the same show. Keep believing your delusional theories of your "writers intent' and be happy as a "pig in shitz".
(04-16-2018, 11:37 PM)Henry of green Wrote:(04-16-2018, 10:58 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:What are you smoking, they said yes that’s fair which is a definite were I am from they didn’t say maybe, mate your delusional. They never said maybe or possibly they said yes that’s fair end of story.I updated the post. If you look back at the past six years of interviews and one on one interviews that they did at comic con. You will notice the writers will agree with any plausible theory. You will also notice they never give a definitive answer. You will also note several time they have said they write for the viewers.
Once again you are leaving things out the writers were asked ,we get the sense that they are still together is that fair and responded with yes that’s fair, they didn’t just say that’s fair they said yes, were a come from that’s a definite apparently you don’t know what yes means, here in Ireland it’s a definite not a maybe or a theroy. The writers never hinted Renard could be the father. The majority of posters accept its Nick and Adalnd at the end so do Grimm Wikipedia as well as ordinary Wikipedia as do the writers words, who backs up the opinions of Renard being the father besides a few extremely biased posters. I don’t recall the writers ever stating Renard being the father was a reasonable theory, also the writers aren’t open to all theories infact they were asked directly in one post show interview if Juliette and Nick could ever get back and outright stated no not in are minds, once again you are talking nonsense.
Also Eric didn’t just sleep with Adalind, she also claimed on more than one occasion that the father could be Renard or Eric she herself admitted in season 3 she didn’t know either way. I believe Renard is the father but unlike Nick being Kelly’s father it’s not a definite. There was never any doubt on the show as to who fathered kelly it was always Nick. The evidence also suggests Renard is Dianna father but unlike with Dianna, Adalind never once claimed Kelly’s father was anyone other than Nick beside openly admitting she would trick Viktor into being the father because kelly needed a new father other than Nick her enemy at the time. Also unlike kelly Dianna looks nothing like her father at all.
Henry, you know what this guy reminds me of? Back in Catholic grammar school I went to. This one student brought in an absen't note for the previous day she was absent. The nun read the note and then held it up to the class to point out what not to do. The student had typed the note on a typewriter and also typed her mothers name as if it was a signature.
The nun not only gave her detention from being un-excused absence. She was given additional detention for being so stupid to think the nun was stupid enough to believe the typed signature to be valid. This is the problem we have with some people today, they think they can pull the wool over your eyes and get away with it. Obviouslly a lesson others never experienced.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!