04-16-2018, 09:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2018, 10:31 PM by Henry of green.)
(04-16-2018, 03:03 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:If you are replying to my post, again, you are deflecting my question. If a bite on her lips to remove her Hex, is considered cheating is fine, but my post wasn't about cheating, it was about her demanding a kiss while she voge and not requesting the same from others. A great example is in your own words. Wesen liked to have sex in voge, why did Juliette only wanted to be in voge with Nick and not Sean or Ken?First I pointed out that using a lose definition of the word , you could consider Nick as the first to cheat. I was making that point because we know his actions was to get her to bite his lip. But Nicks was the one that said it was their first kiss. Adalind is the one that said it was not a kiss.
The purpose of the statement was to show and example of Nick not being repulsed by a woged Adalind, yet was repulsed by a woged Juliette. Also Dianias other mommy kelly I never seen her while body that head could be fake maybe she’s the Mommy at the end
We do not know if Juliette woged for Sean or Ken. But I pointed out times when Sean had woged sex with other. meaning it is not beyond belief that he had woged sex with Juliette. I also pointed out the Eric and the King find hexenbiest beautiful, I then surmised the Kenneth most likely was the same.
Quote: I am confused, some of the same argue that in that last scene in S6, E13, when Kelly was adding to the Grimm Book that he wasn't referring to Nick as his father.It was Diana that said mother and father are waiting. I argue that Nick is not her father. others made the comment that he is her stepfather so she could have been referring to Nick. I argue that as old as she was and Sean being in her life. It is more then likely she would refer to Nick as Nick and not her father. Especial as possessive as Sean character is. It is hard to believe that Sean would go for Someone else be refereed to as her father. Plus as upset as Nick got when Sean referred to Kelly as his, why would he want to do the same with Diana.
Who Diana was referring to can not be proven one way or the other. For every argument you can make for one you can make for the other. It was left ambiguous on purpose because to be definitive would upset one camp of the other. This way each camp can have it which ever way make them happy.
Its not left ambigous you just refuse to accept how the show ended, the writers have said in two interviews Nick and Adalind are still togther in the end. Grimm wiki that site you often use to try and correct others can accept what the writers say in the post mortem interviews but claery you cant because it doesnt back your views. If the writers wanted to be truly ambiguous as you claim then why did they respond by saying yes the fair when asked we get the sense Nick and Adlalind are still together in the end. Surely if they wanted it to be ambiguous they would have simply responded with, there is a possibility they are together yes or yes that’s one way to look at it, but they didn’t they give a clear yes that’s fair. They also put Renard in a different category stating it’s up to viewers to decide what happened to Renard, Eve and trubel but they probably formed together to figth. Why did they put Renard in a different category in the interview if there is a chance he is the father. you can’t point to one interview were they even hint Renard could be the father not one.
If you truly want to be ambiguous then I have an idea then Eric Renard could also be the father at the series end as it was never truly proven Renard was Diania father and we never saw Erics dead body. Also Dianas other mommy kelly, I never saw her whole body that head could be a fake, she and Eric are the mom and dad at the end it makes about as much sense as you claiming Renard rises his daughter to be a Grimm by choice.