03-05-2018, 11:23 AM
(03-02-2018, 05:03 AM)irukandji Wrote:Hi Iruk,(03-01-2018, 06:59 PM)Hexenadler Wrote: Uh...yeah, pretty much. The show maintained N&J's relationship for three seasons, then promptly trashed it in just a few episodes, purely in favor of making "Nadalind" happen (and if you support THAT relationship, accusing "Nickette" of being dangerous is the peak of hypocrisy).
I know you're referring to a different issue here, Hexenadler, but your post gave me some food for thought. The foundation of Nick and Adalind's relationship *is* one of hypocrisy. Nick hated her. She hated him. She was never going to come crawling to him but for the fact the royals threw her out and she had no where to go. He would have never taken her into his private and personal house but did so because....why? Adalind offered and provided him with a spell that was never going to work on Juliette.
You asked:
Quote:He [Nick] would have never taken her [Adalind] into his private and personal house but did so because....why?As I recall, Rosalee urged Nick to be with Adalind when Kelly was born. Nick held Kelly in the hospital room and bonded with his son. It was Adalind that suggested the name Kelly. It was Adalind that offered to set aside their past and work together on behalf of their child.
IMO, the answer to your "why" is simply "Kelly".
Note that Juliette rejected the suppressant potion and threatened to kill Adalind and baby Kelly.
These were all plot lines contrived by G&K grasping for reasons viewers to watch Grimm on Friday night. I continued watching to see Hexenette get her just deserts. The Nadalid arc was a bore to me. One may wonder why NBC didn't cancel Grimm in season 5.
N G