(05-24-2016, 03:40 PM)wfmyers1207 Wrote:There was an interview posted in one of the threads shortly after the finale aired where G or K said the ring would be in play for S6. To what severity and how long, time & the writers will tell. I suspect the ring/spell will be used, at least initially, as a way to prevent Nick & Adalind from living/being together. The ring/spell takes the decision out of their hands, plus gives Nick a temporary reprieve from having to tell Adalind whether he’d want them living together again if the choice was theirs to make.(05-24-2016, 03:33 PM)Robyn Wrote:(05-24-2016, 01:41 PM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:I think Renard was probably imagining himself in Bonaparte's position before the body hit the floor. Unless someone arrives that's equal to or more powerful than Bonaparte, Renard will announce himself as leader of Portland BC. But. He doesn't know that the ring is some kind of threat/control. So will Renard be able to coerce Adalind into continuing their ruse of a happy family?(05-24-2016, 10:29 AM)irukandji Wrote:Could be she will have to wait and see what Sean does now that Conrad is dead who will replace him. Well likely be the 3 or 4 episode next season to get a picture where this is going. Your right she would risk the kids.(05-23-2016, 05:17 PM)syscrash Wrote: I see it Adalind pursues Nick. Nick reluctant.
I have been wondering what Nick thinks about Adalind's decision to take Kelly and move in with Renard. Adalind had Diana help the scoobies, that's true, but would that completely convince Nick that she only moved in with Renard because she had to?
You could be right here, syscrash. Adalind might pursue Nick, but he would be reluctant because she's been with Renard.
There is another possibility that I've been thinking of, one where Adalind stays with her kids and protects them. If that's the case, she won't go back to Nick.
This is one thing I'll be interested in finding out next season. Does the spell remain if the person who cast it is dead?
Way back in S2, when Stefania killed Frau Pech, that seemed to break the spell she had used to duplicate Adalind. Now, is that a general rule, or was that a one time thing?
Or, is this just going to be yet another one of those things the writer's just pretend never happened. You know, like Juliette setting up Kelly and her neighbors to be murdered by the werrat and everyone now saying: "NO, No, that's not what happened at all!!".
Nick told Trubel in the finale that he believed Adalind went to Renard/BC because she didn’t have a choice. Unless the writers change Adalind’s course in S6 I think she will always put her children ahead of Nick.
As for Juliette and culpability, or lack of, I think it’s more about reinventing Juliette into a persona that doesn’t connect with/feel remorse over the past than making a statement that it never happened. I really think more than anything the writers didn’t want to deal with the Nick/Juliette fallout during S5 and their big Wesen uprising arc so they put it on the backburner until later by creating Eve. Now the question is - does anyone care about watching Nick, Juliette, and the others deal with the fallout two seasons later. It could provide great insight and reflection for the characters, or it could fall flat.