10-27-2015, 04:11 PM
(10-26-2015, 09:25 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: You are right. It was never clearly said Nick is the good guy. Maybe I used the wrong words. But anyway, Nick is the hero of the show: that is what I wanted to say with good guy. He is not the kind of admirable hero, but he is the hero of the show.
Yes, I can see him noted as the hero of the show because he is the main male character in the series. However, for me, it stops there. He lacks the qualities of courage, goodness, and strength of character that it takes to make an admirable hero. In my opinion, it really is too bad. That is a sad lack of character development.
(10-26-2015, 09:25 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: All other characters (those considered the heroes) follow Nick without questions. Or... (those considered the villains) They fight Nick in everything he does.
I can't speak for everyone, but I wouldn't mind a storyline involving good wesen who bond together to fight Nick. Again, using his weak character development, they could fight him on a number of issues. Mainly, his ineffectiveness as a Grimm. He's not an effective deterrent and his methods are extremely questionable. Then there's his very presence, which seems to escalate the situation into an attempted escape, which always results in someone getting hurt or killed.
(10-26-2015, 09:25 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: For example, what did the writers say in Juliette's plot?
Between the lines, simply... Juliette was hero because she was at Nick's side. When she decided to stay against Nick she became a villain and deserved to die.
If you compare Juliette's hexenbiest to Renard's Jack the Ripper, the inconsistencies are glaring in comparison.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.