06-18-2019, 04:50 PM
The Sansa vs Danny conflict is a perfect example of the political commentary being made in the end. If you look at the entire conflict as the haves against haves nots. Compare how Sansa story ended. She was shown dawning her royal gown and crown. Not once did Danny projects her self as being regal. She never even wore a crown. Even in Meereen, where Danny would have most definitely been considered the queen. Even Danny's last speech was not that of a Queen but as a liberator. The previous comment about the destruction. She only destroyed the area of the privileged. The biggest tell was Danny destroyed the Red Keep making sure she took out the throne room. If she was truly the mad Queen she would have sat on the throne. Instead she look at it with disgust. George was making the point. One would have to be mad if they thought the little guy could ever not be controlled by the privileged. Even the council was about how they where going to restore their privileged lifestyles. There was nothing about how they where going to help the suffering masses. Even in Meerren Tyrion told her the masters would never give up their position and property. The saddest part was, they all tricked John into not seeing Danny's position. Even Sansa saw how dangerous Danny would be for the privileged. And went along with using John. Another tell was John's look when Drogon melted the throne. It was the look of realization he was lied to. Which is John's story, being lied to by the ones he trusted. Consider, Danny's ideas where exactly the same as the wildlings. The idea of the people being self governing. Like the wildings there was never a vision of privilege. The same with John at every turn he did not want a position of privilege. Yet they made him leader at the wall, then turned on him when he fought for the little guy. They made him King of the north then turned on him when he went to seek help from the one who liberated the slave cities. They prayed of the bigoted bias of how they felt about Targaryen. Think about this. The negative view of Targaryen is all based on a single view. Arguments always centered around the mad King. Yet the wildfire was only inside the walls of the Red Keep area. You have Danny how came to power by liberating the oppressed. Then you have John who is a Targaryen. This contradicts the idea that Targaryens are evil by nature. I see this as George making the point of the danger of propaganda.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one