09-15-2015, 05:31 AM
(09-15-2015, 04:33 AM)New Guy Wrote: In order for Juliette to "slum" with Nick, he would need to be below the poverty line and live in a depressed area. Compensation data indicate they have comparable income and they live under the same roof.
Sorry, but I don't agree with your compensation data. You brought in some online statistics, even though you yourself claim you have no idea of Juliette and Nick's income, their assets, liabilities, etc. You didn't take into consideration that Juliette appears to own her own practice. You didn't show compensation for a DMV who treats both farm and domestic animals. You didn't take into consideration that Juliette might also treat exotic pets. You also didn't take into consideration what compensation would be needed for Juliette to purchase her house. In addition, instead of giving us the make, model, and year of her car, you simply chalk it off as something common and bring your friend into the picture, stating he can afford to drive a Bentley but instead drives a Chevette, and in the end finish it by stating we can't judge a book by its cover. What?!!
You insist slumming actually means going into the slums in this case when it does not. You continually bash Juliette, calling her anything and everything you can think of. But suddenly, because I brought up an argument about Juliette slumming with Nick, you make innuendos about my 'contempt' for his character. The thread isn't about Nick or bashing him and I said nothing of the kind.
If you really don't believe Juliette was slumming, come up with something more than some useless website data, where you provide the top dollar salaries of top officials that has no bearing on the debate.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.