(12-17-2020, 03:04 PM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: No, no and no. Julitette didn't have to know that Kenneth was going to have the neighbors killed. All she had to know was that whatever he was going to use the information for was probably going to be illegal. That's all that's required.
So let me get this straight with perhaps another example because I don't think this is correct. Someone comes to my door and asks me where the Smiths and Jones live. I don't like the look of the guy, but I really don't attribute that to anything, and give him the names and addresses. Days later, the Smiths and the Jones are murdered. You're stating I'm guilty of murder (according to Oregon law) because I provided neighbors' names and addresses?
I'm not trying to be a smart aleck here, but I think your statement presumes that just a little information, which can be easily found through other means including looking it up, is grounds for a murder charge.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.