(02-12-2016, 01:36 PM)syscrash Wrote: Logical integrity only comes into question when making an assumption, or drawing a conclusion. A statement of fact has no room for investigation. The middle of the day and you are underground and I tell you the sun is up. Would you still need to verify it?
The fact is there are four parts to any contract. My opinion is consideration is the important one. But a bloody mark only show acceptance.
No offer, no consequence, and definitely no consideration.
Syscrash, let me ask this. With regard to your example, how do you know the sun is up? Did you go check it? Is it your opinion? Did you use scientific data? What's the location? See, in Central America, the sun might be up high in the sky in midday. At the Arctic Circle, it might not have risen at all.
If you trotted up the stairs, opened the door and saw the sun was up, shouldn't anyone else be given that same consideration? If you based it on someone else's opinion, that's your choice. If you took a star chart and figured the position of the sun, that is also your choice.
The important thing is that you were given a choice. A few choices in fact. Since you were given a choice, in all fairness, anyone who questions your statement should be allowed the same choices.
I don't happen to agree with your opinion, and you said it yourself, it is an opinion. It is not fact. You might be correct, or you could be incorrect. I don't know. It requires further research on my part.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.