(06-06-2015, 10:37 AM)irukandji Wrote:Rosalee when Juliette asked her it you had to be born a hexenbeist Rosalee said you could be made one but didn't know that much about it.(06-06-2015, 04:43 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: I like this point but (just my thought) I believed the hexenbiest power Alalind got were like stealing them from the hexenbiest they killed (can't think of the name), and not her own returned. That was the first part of the test to see if the hexenbiest would take on a new host.
I had a thousand things written up on this today, but kept changing them, so I'll start again. Elizabeth herself tests the potion and assumes Adelind's form, but she remains Elizabeth. Juliette also assumes the form and confirms she's still Juliette. If there was any trace of Adelind's hexenbiest at that point, I'd think Juliette would have said so.
Could sleeping with Nick have been the trigger that started her hexenbiest transition? Maybe he passed on something from Adelind to her. Not a piece of Adelind's hexenbiest because I still think Juliette has hexenbiest in her blood, and had it from day one. It was just dormant. What if Nick passed along some chemical reaction from Adalind that triggered Juliette's hexenbiest?
So let's say some one knew a hexenbeist and wanted those type of powers, she would find someone like the women in Austria who knew how to start the process like she did for Adalind. The one wanting the powers (after the whole getting just say the item needed) then they would have to accepted by the hexenbeist as a new host,but we would get a run of the mill hexenbeist with what ever level of power the original hexenbeist had (just thinking).
The birth of Diana wasn't necessary for the completion Adalind's process, but the process did increase Diana powers (or made her something new). Now let's say somewhere in Juliette past was a hexenbieist (stealing your idea) the change for Juliette to Adalind (I'm back to her hair) the small sample in the hair was what started the process on Juliette but when you put a Grimm in the picture you get something that can't be explained. We may be putting ideas into what I call "in the script" meaning it not ever going to be explained just is.
Your thoughts?