03-23-2015, 09:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-23-2015, 09:19 PM by Samsarilian.)
(03-23-2015, 05:05 PM)speakeasy Wrote: I left off one important Hexenbiest from my list and that was Diana. I place my trust in Kelly's belief that the child will a source of great good or great evil depending on who raises her, and that she must not be raised in the castle. So, my logic collapses if I accept that premise and I now have to admit there's no possibility that all Hexenbiests are inherently kind of selfish and bad. .
Now we are into the nature vs. nurture debate. Is it possible that the Hexanbiests we have seen are evil only because of a cultural bias they are raised by. If so why would Juliette have a 'dark nature' just because she becomes a Hexan? I think this is something the writers may have over looked.
I would not expect her to be a little miss goody two shoes, the old saying is "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." but there is no reason to make her go totally evil either. Or to make her run to Sean as the writers are.
Also though they have not shown a lot of Elizabeth I am not sure she is evil either. Evil is rarely self sacrificing and she saved Sean in a way that risked herself. She may merely be someone that has learned to be weary of others. She must feel betrayed by Sean's father who did not ACT to help his own son when his wife sent assassins.
If I had something important to say, I would have mumbled it.