(04-06-2019, 10:56 AM)irukandji Wrote:(04-06-2019, 10:46 AM)N_grimm Wrote: Kelly kept Diana perfectly safe, until Juliette turned into an evil monster and stabbed all her friends in the back. Taking Diana was cruel to Adalind at the time but was portrayed as a necessary sacrifice for the greater good. In retrospect, even Adalind seemed to understand this and was thankful that Kelly kept Diana safe. She even named her son after her.
Kelly *volunteered* to keep Diana safe, convincing everyone (with the exception of the most important person, Adalind), that she could do so.
Juliette sent her an email. Kelly had the option to ignore it or followup on it. No one forced her to Nick's doorstep. She made that decision on her own.
As a caveat, I am not saying that Juliette was absolved of evil. What I am saying is that Kelly broke the trust of everyone who agreed to let her take Diana for safekeeping.
So, no, Kelly did not keep Diana perfectly safe because Kelly couldn't stay away.
That is an absurd argument. Kelly thought Nick, her son, was in mortal danger - because Juliette lied to her (a person she trusted with her life). Kelly didn't come to Nick's house to fight, but for Juliette to tell her what had happened to Nick - so she could help him. Do you seriously think Kelly should have said: ok let Nick die, I have to take care of Diana? Had she come to the house, and Juliette was still herself, Juliette (and the others who did not participate in the rescue operation) would have looked after Diana while Kelly helped save Nick. Kelly thought Juliette was a kind person who loved her son.