10-20-2017, 09:14 AM
@WispyWillow, @wesen and @jsgrimm45 you're all raising a point that gets lost in the midst of the ire rising from Adalind taking Kelly to the BC mansion. It was a stupid thing for her to do but it is evident Kelly would still be in danger if she had left him behind. We see with Bonaparte's torturing of Nick that it centered around taking Kelly away from him. With Kelly left behind, he was prime target against Nick to force him to hand over the Grimm family tree book. As long as Adalind had Kelly at the mansion, it was simpler to use the separation against Nick but he wouldn't need to act on any threats as yet because on the other hand, they had to sell the idea of "happy families" with Renard. As long as Bonaparte had Adalind under his control, harming Kelly, his leverage against Nick, would have worked against his cause.
In the end, Kelly's was as equally safe and in danger with either Nick or Adalind, depending on what Bonaparte was prepared to do to get what he wanted.
In the end, Kelly's was as equally safe and in danger with either Nick or Adalind, depending on what Bonaparte was prepared to do to get what he wanted.