04-24-2018, 06:32 AM
(04-24-2018, 04:30 AM)irukandji Wrote: Because this is such a long and drawn out paragraph with many questions, I'm going to take this one at a time:This is why, an intelligent conversation can not be held with you.
Quote:Are you capable of being objectively at all, as a mother? For one minute put yourself in place of being Nicks mom, not Kelly or a Grimm. Just his plain mom, and you know what has happened in his life, just to name a few.
Now before you go off accusing me yet again of "skewering things", consider your paragraph. I have no idea what the intent of this is because you don't explain why you feel a mother's expectations in this instance are paramount. You yourself have to agree that you are not known for detailed and thought provoking thoughts put into words. Instead you do quite the opposite. You load the post with a bunch of questions, then turn around and accuse others of not answering them.
When answers come and they don't suit you, you start bolding, calling names and doing your usual bullying so one of your other accomplices will chime in and acknowledge how useful calling names and insulting others can be. That's you in about 95% of your posts. Read them.
You call me out about my methods as you see them? Well, surprise, surprise, you're just as predictable. Strange for a person who says he was so involved in debates.
I answered the question based on the small bit of information I had. In other words, my expectations of Nick or any other son are of no bearing.
It's not skewering, it's what I think. But yet because it doesn't suit you, you get all puffed up and start hurling the accusations of skewering.
It's funny, I thought all opinions were acceptable here, not just what you want to read.
You accuse of name calling when there is none. Maybe thats why I would. If i am going to be accused I might as well do it.
You accuse me of not posting details when I list a whole bunch of details while you are the one that makes assumptions with no details to back them up..
Quote:You yourself have to agree that you are not known for detailed and thought provoking thoughts put into words. Instead you do quite the opposite. You load the post with a bunch of questions, then turn around and accuse others of not answering them.
You complain of me asking too many questions. Yea I do. Do I expect them all to be answered? No. Their purpose are more as food for thought, since your opinions are proof that those questions never come to mind to such a closed minded baseless opinionated contributor. Those questions are to provoke your thoughts to see if you have overlooked some factual content, yet you accuse me of not doing what you are incapable of recognizing what you are complaining about.
You claim I have no respect for others opinions. I have respect of others opinions. What I dis-respect when you make opinions by purposely overlooking the facts. When you are confronted with facts your do not rebuff those facts or prove them inaccurate to support your opinion. You claim it as dis-respecting your opinion. How about you, respecting the facts, before you earn the right to have your opinion respected?
You want respect? Try defending your opinions with facts to back them up when confronted with innacurate or made up situations. If you believe opinions are not based on facts? well, there goes the intelligent part of the conversation.
It it possible, as an example, to at least answer one simple question? In your opinion, why is Juliette allowed to carry on acting as if she is no longer in a relationship with Nick, She has moved out. You respect her doing as she pleases. She walked out on him. Goes on a bar hopping spree and gets arrested. Is respected by you and a few others to have intimate relationships as an independent single woman. Yet, Nick isn't even able to defend his unborn child and consider him taking sides as if he was cheating on her.
Those are what I call details, not the lack of them. If it is too confusing to you let me try it in a more simplistic and less detailed. In other words, In your opinion, why is Juliette allowed to treat him as he is no longer her boyfriend, yet you expect him to treat her as if she is still his girlfriend.
I guess your opinion is not allowed to be questioned because it is your opinion. Hence, more proof of why, we can not conduct an intelligent conversation. If all you are going to do is, stand in your corner, stomp your feet and throw a hussy-fit, then you claim how others are incapable of having an intelligent discussion. Meanwhile you are the one incapable of having a detailed opinionated intelligent conversation.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!