02-14-2018, 07:02 PM
(02-13-2018, 05:26 PM)irukandji Wrote:Actually, I was referring Juliette having trouble with Nick, not Nick having trouble with Juliette. When Juliette woged, there was no suspicion she that she was a hex, no secret at all. I was referring to her concerns about what secrets Nick was hiding. He didn't try to deny he had secrets, which was proof he had them, and he didn't want to say what they were, which meant they were bad. He didn't say "I can't say because they are a case I am working on". Stonewalling is a sign there is something really bad that is secret.(02-13-2018, 10:57 AM)eric Wrote: Maybe a person is assumed innocent until proven innocent in a court of law (not always in the court of public opinion), but when you are talking personal relationship, the opposite is more the rule. When suspicions about your intimate "friend" come up he/she bears the burden of proof of innocence. I think we have seen situations where we all say "how can he/she so stupid to believe THAT story?". We usually end up being correct.
Exactly. When Juliette became a hexenbiest you could tell right off Nick considered her guilty. He considered her so guilty he became obsessed with "fixing" her.
(02-13-2018, 05:33 AM)Henry of green Wrote: At least Adalind left Nick with a note explaining why she had to leave to protect the children and him and also saying she loved him.
He's the grimm. Does he really need Adalind, the mouse in the corner. to be his protectress? Really, henry, I thought your argument would have held more merit than that.