Quote:That is the most ridicules interpretation of the show I have read. You can not point to a single interview by either the actors or writers to support the theory. There is nothing in the dialog that supports your interpretation.
Nothing except the explicit facts. My interpretation is of course correct. The show is exactly as I presented it and mine is the correct interpretation. That a degenerate such as yourself cannot accept simple reality is of no surprise to me. But thank you for taking the time to read the post, even if your limited perspective prevents you from comprehending the profundity of my commentary.
(01-02-2017, 03:36 PM)Robyn Wrote: G&K invested their time and energy deciding whether they wanted a Nick/Adalind and forgot that Kelly is the only reason Nick/Adalind is even a possibility.
Through extrapolation of the comments G&K made about the end of series I think it is fair to say somewhere around Season 3 of Grimm they invested their time in developing a new series and more or less abandoned Grimm in terms of creativity or focus. It appears they went the route of least resistance.
I do not know squat about these guys (G&K) but they do remind of a "type". In the business community there are creative types, they excel at conceptualizing a business format but almost always lack the ability to successfully operate the enterprise. As mentioned previously, I think the concept of Grimm is exceptional, but the execution was tragically flawed after the first season.
Oxford commas are so totally rad!.