quote]
ofcourse it's on another level which is why i believe she lost control of it and suffered which was greatly greatly accelerated by adalind's use of the baby to turn nick against her.if he stood by juliette the whole event could have been prevented: he could have left adalind with sean or hank and stayed with juliette.
By the way adalind working with the royals was the same as hexenette working with royals. at any point any1 of the scooby gang could have died and the royals & not adalind would have be blamed. why cant that be for hexenette- she's been labelled a murder when she wasnt the one that killed his mother or even knew that was their intention.
[/quote]
This has been discussed before but Adalind and Juliette working for the Royals is not the same because Juliette was part of the group. It's the feeling of betrayal along with her actions that separates her from Adalind. I think part of the reason the writers had Juliette do these things is because the reaction to it would be larger than had Adalind done them. Adalind will be torn to shreds if she goes against Nick and crew next season.
I won't debate here about what Juliette knew but she sent Kelly the message about Nick being in trouble. She told Kenneth not to underestimate Kelly. Juliette had to know that Kelly would not allow anyone to take Diana without a fight. She was upstairs when she heard Kelly being attacked and sat there and did nothing. Juliette could've gone downstairs and interfered once she heard the fighting start because she's powerful enough to take down everyone in that room. She was most certainly complicit in Kelly's death because she wouldn't have even been found, let alone killed, without Juliette sending her that message. The Royals don't get to Kelly without Juliette. That's the reason Kenneth bailed her out of jail.
ofcourse it's on another level which is why i believe she lost control of it and suffered which was greatly greatly accelerated by adalind's use of the baby to turn nick against her.if he stood by juliette the whole event could have been prevented: he could have left adalind with sean or hank and stayed with juliette.
By the way adalind working with the royals was the same as hexenette working with royals. at any point any1 of the scooby gang could have died and the royals & not adalind would have be blamed. why cant that be for hexenette- she's been labelled a murder when she wasnt the one that killed his mother or even knew that was their intention.
[/quote]
This has been discussed before but Adalind and Juliette working for the Royals is not the same because Juliette was part of the group. It's the feeling of betrayal along with her actions that separates her from Adalind. I think part of the reason the writers had Juliette do these things is because the reaction to it would be larger than had Adalind done them. Adalind will be torn to shreds if she goes against Nick and crew next season.
I won't debate here about what Juliette knew but she sent Kelly the message about Nick being in trouble. She told Kenneth not to underestimate Kelly. Juliette had to know that Kelly would not allow anyone to take Diana without a fight. She was upstairs when she heard Kelly being attacked and sat there and did nothing. Juliette could've gone downstairs and interfered once she heard the fighting start because she's powerful enough to take down everyone in that room. She was most certainly complicit in Kelly's death because she wouldn't have even been found, let alone killed, without Juliette sending her that message. The Royals don't get to Kelly without Juliette. That's the reason Kenneth bailed her out of jail.