05-10-2015, 01:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-10-2015, 01:44 PM by soydominique.)
(05-10-2015, 10:54 AM)droid327 Wrote: -Aww Wu, why'd you let Jack get the drop on you? You knew what the situation was, you should have expected that.
-Juliette isn't a whore because she's bad and a woman...She's bad because she uses her sexuality in a selfish or vindictive way. She slept with Kenneth for revenge for Nick sleeping with Adalind in that bed.
-Rosalie had no reason to be angry at Sean, post exorcism, and she would have known that full well. It's just sloppy writing.
-I didn't know that the actress playing Kelly was off the table, but I surmised as much after seeing how they handled her death. I feel better that she had to be killed off, and they weren't just killing her to prove what a bad ass Juliette or Kenneth is. It also makes it a little better that she brought Diana with her, into a situation she thought was dangerous enough to put Nick in mortal danger, which doesn't make much sense prima facie.
-Kelly being gone, I want Trubel to get The Kill now. Juliette needs a good ol fashioned Grimming.
-Something inside me is very, very worried that Juliette survives the finale to become the big bad for next season, and is pregnant with Kenneths half royal half hexenbiest baby to go with Diana, because apparently everyone in Grimm gets pregnant the first time they sleep with anyone and no one has had sex ed.
Yep, agree with the Juliette note! That discernment is what I was trying to point out. I think Trubel should make an awesome comeback too!
Also, I totally think Juliette is pregnant but then people won't be sure if it's Renard's or Kenneth's. It'll be Royal though, so that'll be a mess.
(05-10-2015, 09:54 AM)AddictedtoGrimm Wrote:True. It was just a joke. Not a very funny one, but just a joke.(05-10-2015, 08:37 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote: Remember diana is a special chid part Hexenbiest part Sexinbeist..the combination could enhance her growth...however dispite all this time with Kelly , the child seemed to be oblivious on what just happened in front of her..why didn't she save her " mother" She could make things disappear when she was just several weeks old to help her mom Adaline escape Nick's house.....something is not right . She coulld use her powers and they must be enhanced even further than when she was a baby.... to save Kelly, but seemed to not know what happened to her.
As for Renard I wished that there was 2 enities one attracted to water and the other Jack who Made Renard's wounds bleed....because at 1st Renard was only made to assault men ( in various dress like his pajamas) than all of a sudden he slicing and dicing women fully dressed..they did not explained the 2 totally different ways Jack possessed Sean... ( that's why I thought there was 2 enities .
The exocism was boring ( don't get me wrong any time Sean can rip his shirt off in my eyes is a good thing) but I think they should have not let the audience know what they were doing to save Renard...so when everything worked ( with the glitch) with rosalee I would have been more on the edge of my seat instead of okay it work , what's next
As for juliette there is no turning back, because of her Kelly was ambushed, because of her in activity Kelly was murdered, not to mention she had a hand in indirectly gerring 6??? neighbors of hers slaughtered sensely...not to mention almost shooting Monroe, burning down Nick's only link to His aunt, nope even if she gain a heart there is no forgiveness for Juliette
Lastly
What's with Rosalee? I know Renard grabbed her , but he was possessed , then you purposely stabbed the syringe in Renard's neck VERY HARD and exclaim I hope this really hurts What?????then she wanted to kill him if the potion didn't work. I was yelling at the screen ... get a grip Roselee , I just hope that it was the left over of Julette throwing you around and almost shooting Monroe, although I like the feisty Rosalee get peeved at the right person.
Why is everyone frieking out over Rosalee stabbing the syringe in Renards neck? wouldnt you be mad if someone grabbed you and started choking you and had to be shot in order to be stopped? I think people are overreacting about Rosalee.
(05-09-2015, 06:00 PM)Belle Wrote:(05-09-2015, 01:33 PM)soydominique Wrote:(05-09-2015, 01:08 PM)Belle Wrote: You kind of knew it was going to be his mom's head in the box, but I just kept hoping and praying it wasn't true. A part of me even wants to hold onto hope like the other posters that it wasn't really her, but...I think it has to be in order to set Nick up to kill Juliette and good riddance. The real problem with what Juliette has become is that I'm not convinced that being a hexenbeast means you have to be an evil mega-whore. I didn't particularly like the character before, but now there is very little Juliette could do in order to redeem herself. Then again, they have softened Adalind quite a bit, so I suppose we'll have to see.
On a sexist note, while I won't miss Jack the ripper, I will miss seeing the Captain flash his chest every episode.
Pretty sure it was already sexist when Juliette was called a whore. It's misogynistic. It's not sexist saying seeing Renard's chest is a perk. That's obviously what the writer's wanted. He was put on display on purpose. Promiscuity has nothing to do with Juliette being a bad person. She's being a bad person because she's hurting people on purpose. For some reason, society (especially mainstream television) likes intertwining woman's sexuality with "badness," which is unnecessary. Don't get me wrong, she's a bad person because she decided to cheat on Nick (even though they DID break up kind of), but I'm just against the term 'whore.' It's unnecessary and is never used in a context of when men do they same thing.
If this is confusing, this video would be helpful:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3bQLq9QGA4
Sorry, I'm perceptive when it comes to feminist issues because, duh, I'm a woman and encourage reevaluating the playing field.
Umm...Lighten up. I used to teach human sexuality courses so I am well aware of the ins and outs of gender and language. For the record I refer to men who sleep around indiscriminately as whores too, just in case that will make you feel better. I hope you realize this is supposed to be a fun forum, not a dissertation on neo-feminism. Would it be so bad to just keep things light? Do you really have to crap all over people?
I don't care if anyone here taught human sexuality. I teach this also. If you have the prerogative to not care about this stuff, that's yours. You're overreaction by saying I'm "crapping all over people," is all on you too. Obviously, you took this way too personally. I attached a video because I was down to talk about this. This wasn't even me starting a fight. Also, the "I call men whores, too" point doesn't redeem anything. I don't understand why people have to be judged by their sexuality--men, women, or non-binaries. Juliette used her sexuality for deceit on purpose, which doesn't make her a whore (the same for any male character)--it just means she's a malicious person. And these things are relevant to me. They help me judge the writing, which is what I bring up on the forum too. Like that hibernaculum episode, horrible writing. This episode, way better. So, how about you chill; people have differing priorities and I just care about different things than you.