Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - Printable Version +- Grimm Forum (https://grimmforum.com/forum) +-- Forum: Grimm Universe (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Grimm-Universe) +--- Forum: Spoilers (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Spoilers) +---- Forum: Season 6 Spoilers (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Season-6-Spoilers) +---- Thread: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? (/Thread-Conrad-Bonaparte-read-Adalind-s-future) |
RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - Nicholas White - 02-03-2017 (02-03-2017, 04:36 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(02-03-2017, 04:13 PM)Nicholas White Wrote:(02-02-2017, 05:15 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(02-02-2017, 05:12 PM)Nicholas White Wrote:(02-02-2017, 09:57 AM)irukandji Wrote: Diana left Adalind when she was a newborn. She's estimated to be about three years old now. That means she was absent from both Diana and Renard for more than a year. Where did you get January from? We have no dates on her birth besides the year. The weather in portland(Shown on screen) wouldn't even support that. Not to mention alot of the events wouldn't work. Things we do know: Diana was around 2-3 weeks old when Adalind came back to Portland. Like someone Mentioned Adalind said 10 days old. We know Adalind only remained in portland before going back to Europe for about a month. Adalind got Pregnant with Kelly between Episode 3x21-3x22 Adalind went full term. No mention of Kelly being born premature or a spread up pregnancy. No reason to think the Pregnancy was any different from a regular one. We know she was pregnant all of season 4 and Season 5 picks up right where season 4 left off. Right now we are barely at a year. This are facts and things shown on screen. We know Kelly hasn't had his first birthday as Adalind hasn't said anything and would without a doubt said something. So right now we are barely at 2 years. Diana isn't 3 years old. When you put the events that happened after Diana was born into perspective it isn't hard to see she isn't 3 years old. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - syscrash - 02-03-2017 The problem is, measuring the length of events you come up with one time line. But using the dates on documents you come up with another. The problem with using the dates on documents. When the prop department is setting things up they do not take into consideration of where in the show they are. They just use the current date with the scene was set up. That is why the dates streach fro 2014 to 2016 but cause that is the span of the production dates. But logically there is no way from the time Adalind came to Portland to now is two years. In the first few season the show keep pace with actual time. The holidays on the show matched the actual holidays. We know the time of the show is barely a year because of Kelly. Kelly was conceived because Diana as a baby was taken. The show said Diana was 10 days old when she came to Portland. The kidnapping had to happen with in days of Adalind coming to Portland. say it took a month for adalind to find her mothers storage and plan to take Nick powers. At the most that would make Diana 2 months old and that is stretching it. That means Kelly was conceived while Diana was two months old. Lets add nine months for the pregnancy. Kelly was born when Diana was taken by the Royals. That mean Diana could have only been one year old when Nick mom died and Juliette went to HW. We now go into season 5. From the time Kelly was born to now where Kelly is shown to be no more then 6 months old. Combine that with the year from the previous season. The most Diana could be is a year and a half. Even if we stretch and say Kelly is nine month or even a year. The most that would make Diana is two years old. There is no way to account for Diana being three years old. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - FaceInTheCrowd - 02-03-2017 Grimm time is clearly not linear. Some episodes happen in a day, others take several, but none have ever appeared to occur over more than a week. There is also no correlation between the real time between episodes and the "story time." some episodes have no time between them because of cliffhangers, while others could be weeks apart. So we really have no choice but to accept the dates that appear on the screen and distort our own perceptions to fit. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - rpmaluki - 02-03-2017 I agree with Syscrash's deduction based on the story time line. Diana is technically a year and a half although her birth on screen happened years ago based on real time. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - izzy - 02-03-2017 (02-03-2017, 09:54 AM)New Guy Wrote: Hi Izzy, NewGuy, since you asked me, given the change we have had in office and i now feel justice may prevail once again in this once great nation; as a member of City Council I would go to the United States Attorney for Northern Oregon and demand a special prosecutor from the DOJ. I would do everything I could to see Renard, Nick, Wu, and Hank and most of that corrupt police department disbanded, prosecuted, imprisoned, their pension taken and time added to whatever sentence is handed out for hate crimes (which I still contend is asinine). Although I will say it is pretty clear all four should be eventually be executed for their crimes. So my message to the people who elected me would be I am calling the United States Attorney for Northern Oregon and demand a special prosecutor from the DOJ. Kindest regards... RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - FaceInTheCrowd - 02-03-2017 Adalind goes into labor with Diana in episode 313. In that same episode, two stolen vehicles driven by the Wildesheer have licence plates that expire in March of 2014 and and June of 2014. The odds that two vehicles stolen from different states could both have expired plates is pretty slim, so Diana was definitely born sometime in the first half of 2014. Episode 601 takes place in January, so unless we want to say it's still Jan 2016 on the show, it's been at least two and a half years since Diana was born. The existence of HW as a government black op tells us that the US government is trying to keep the existence of wesen secret from the general population. There is probably data mining going on that flags any investigations that risk revealing the existence of wesen. Any investigators, prosecutors or politicians running these investigations would most likely be visited by federal agencies promising dire consequences if their investigations were not quashed, evidence would disappear from records and lockups and witnesses and suspects would vanish into WITSEC or be renditioned to Saudi Arabia or Lithuania. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - izzy - 02-03-2017 (02-03-2017, 04:16 PM)irukandji Wrote: I have been wondering why Eve was wandering through the tunnels by herself. I know part of it is so that she can investigate this stick Let's see someone is wandering through a tunnel with their stick...sounds like the plot of a 1950s porno flick...just sayin' LOL! RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - MarylikesGrimm - 02-04-2017 (02-03-2017, 10:22 PM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: Adalind goes into labor with Diana in episode 313. In that same episode, two stolen vehicles driven by the Wildesheer have licence plates that expire in March of 2014 and and June of 2014. The odds that two vehicles stolen from different states could both have expired plates is pretty slim, so Diana was definitely born sometime in the first half of 2014. In the "The Show Must Go On" the date on the ticket stubs was March 19, 2014 for the murdered women. The "The Show Must Go On" (316) is after episode 314 when Diana was born therefore based on this information she was born before March 19, 2014. Why do you know that 601 takes place in January? RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - FaceInTheCrowd - 02-04-2017 Sean gets a call on his phone and it displays the date as Jan 6th. RE: Conrad Bonaparte read Adalind's future??? - MarylikesGrimm - 02-04-2017 (02-04-2017, 01:11 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: Sean gets a call on his phone and it displays the date as Jan 6th.Based on that, isn't Diana about to 2 years old and 10 - 11 months? |