Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - Printable Version +- Grimm Forum (https://grimmforum.com/forum) +-- Forum: Grimm Universe (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Grimm-Universe) +--- Forum: Spoilers (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Spoilers) +---- Forum: Season 4 Spoilers (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Season-4-Spoilers) +---- Thread: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? (/Thread-Would-Juliette-really-have-killed-Nick) |
RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - Adriano Neres Rodrigues - 06-14-2015 (06-14-2015, 07:26 PM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:(06-14-2015, 06:52 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote:Adriao I have not been following this thread for a while, but seen this was your post thought I check what was being said. I like you cause and effects points.(06-13-2015, 09:34 PM)irukandji Wrote: A question here, Adriano, Why would Monroe or Rosalee believe Juliette is no longer human? jsgrimm45, thank you. I just tried to link the dots. (06-14-2015, 08:08 PM)irukandji Wrote: Adriano, I think we just see things differently. I hope this is not a bad thing... . RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - irukandji - 06-15-2015 It's not a bad thing, Adriano. We just see it differently that's all. Okay, here are my conclusions on the fourth season. Juliette did not leave with the royals as expected. She came back home. Focusing specifically Rosalee and Monroe, and knowing what I know of them from the fourth season, I think they would want to know why. I could see them going to the hospital to talk to her. They might even pursue the reasons why she acted the way she did at the spice shop. Then, based on what Juliette tells them, I see Rosalee, specifically, taking 20 steps back and looking at what she could have done differently that day in the spice shop. Rosalee is a herbalist, but in her own way, she is also a scientist. She would no doubt question why she put her faith in a belief system rather than scientifically weighing the situation and coming up with facts based on her knowledge. She would question why she handled the situation so sloppily and if she was acting in Juliette’s best interests or her own. As for Juliette, her outcome depends upon what she tells Monroe and Rosalee. She may very well wish to remain a hexenbiest, but might ask for help in dealing with her symptoms. She might want to be a human again in which case a search begins for a cure. If she decides she wants to remain a hexenbiest and wants to remain in their company, then they all (not just Juliette) will have to work together to resolve their conflicts. RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - Adriano Neres Rodrigues - 06-15-2015 Well... actually I don't know if we are seeing things so diferently... Let me explain... (06-14-2015, 06:52 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: I also know that things can be different if some of them stop the negative rolling ball and the other accept the, last call, “good will act”. (06-15-2015, 08:41 AM)irukandji Wrote: Okay, here are my conclusions on the fourth season. Juliette did not leave with the royals as expected. She came back home. Focusing specifically Rosalee and Monroe, and knowing what I know of them from the fourth season, I think they would want to know why. I could see them going to the hospital to talk to her. They might even pursue the reasons why she acted the way she did at the spice shop. This would be the “good will act” I talked about. Juliette's reaction to that action would be able to stop the negative rolling ball. (06-15-2015, 08:41 AM)irukandji Wrote: Then, based on what Juliette tells them, You quote that the sequense depends on Juliete's reaction. That is exactly my point point. The things the will happend after dependes on how they are reacting now to what happend before. (06-15-2015, 08:41 AM)irukandji Wrote: I see Rosalee, specifically, taking 20 steps back and looking at what she could have done differently that day in the spice shop. Rosalee is a herbalist, but in her own way, she is also a scientist. She would no doubt question why she put her faith in a belief system rather than scientifically weighing the situation and coming up with facts based on her knowledge. She would question why she handled the situation so sloppily and if she was acting in Juliette’s best interests or her own.Just to point out. I based my argues in a cause efect chain reaction. So, I can perfectly see Rosalee doing this. But as you said, she should take "... 20 steps back". So, we have a dinamic that must be reverse. (06-15-2015, 08:41 AM)irukandji Wrote: As for Juliette, her outcome depends upon what she tells Monroe and Rosalee. She may very well wish to remain a hexenbiest, but might ask for help in dealing with her symptoms. She might want to be a human again in which case a search begins for a cure. If she decides she wants to remain a hexenbiest and wants to remain in their company, then they all (not just Juliette) will have to work together to resolve their conflicts. You have just explained how the characteres can react in a way that Rosalee and Juliette get close friends again. The diference I see between our point of view is that you are framing a positive perspective where characteres would act in a positive way so they get close again. In your previwed future they would reverse the tendence of past actions and build a new light future (I am using those terms just to mark a difference with what I will wrote bellow). In my term, I am framing a negative perspective where characteres would act in negative way so would get even more apart from each other. In my previewed future they would reinforce the dark tendence the 4th season ended. (I am using dark just to mark as diferent from the term light I used above). Let me explain that I am not using a negative perspective because I believe this is the right one, or becuase your preview would not happend. I am using the negative perspective becuase I believe that to get to your preview (the light future) they will have to deal and by pass obstacles that, if they didn't, they would end up in my preview (the dark future). Back to the subject to give an exemple. Rosalee can imagine that Juliette went back to the house to kill Nick and them go out to Europe to live with the royals. If Rosalee believes that, she would never go to the hospital. This is an obstacle to your light future perfectly possible based on how things happend in the end of seasson 4. But, Rosalee can also "want to know why", as you said, by passing the dark obstacle I have put above. That is also perfectly possible based in Rosalee's actions in all 4 seassons. If we get only mine preview, we will lost the perspective that "... the show is about acceptance" as you comment in another post. But if we get only your preview, we will lost the perspective that the last season put a mine field between Rosalee/Monroe and Juliette. And this mine field must be by passed. Actually, I think it would be very interesting to see how the show writers would build season 5 story to get them close again... How would they write characters actions to by pass the close past events in season 4. RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - irukandji - 06-15-2015 Adriano, you are incorrect. I was not looking at it from a positive or negative aspect, but trying to look at it according to our previous discussion and apply the logical outcome. You set the parameters for the scenario. Juliette lives and wants to be part of the group again. You asked the question if Rosalie and Monroe take her back. In addition, you're specific about the fourth season. That's the way I looked at it, according to what you said. I don't think whether Rosalie or Monroe take her back is even an issue any more because Juliette changed the dynamics. It isn't an instance of her leaving for a long while and then coming home and trying to win them back. She didn't leave but came back home. Now the question I think Rosalee and Monroe would be asking is why. Does that make sense? RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - Adriano Neres Rodrigues - 06-15-2015 (06-15-2015, 11:03 AM)irukandji Wrote: Adriano, you are incorrect. I was not looking at it from a positive or negative aspect, but trying to look at it according to our previous discussion and apply the logical outcome. You set the parameters for the scenario. Juliette lives and wants to be part of the group again. You asked the question if Rosalie and Monroe take her back. In addition, you're specific about the fourth season. That's the way I looked at it, according to what you said. It does make sense... for sure... But in my opinion, you are seeing only one side of the coin. You are saying that Juliette changed the dynamic... And because of that Rosalee will automaticaly get close to her again. That is only half correctly, in my opinion. Juliette made 50% of the job to change the dynamic. The other 50% depends on Rosalee's and Monroe's interpretation of this action. You are taking for sure that Rosalee will interpret Juliette's actions in a perspective of goog will. I understand that you only see logic in this scenario. That is why, in my opinion, you are seeing this by a positive perspective. I can see other events happening, that I have alredy wrote before, interfering in their interpretation of Juliette's actions. I can see logic in a negative scenario. RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - irukandji - 06-15-2015 (06-15-2015, 12:12 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: It does make sense... for sure... But in my opinion, you are seeing only one side of the coin. No, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm not even addressing the issue of whether or not Rosalee will get close to Juliette or not. It's a non-existent issue at this point, in my opinion. RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - New Guy - 06-16-2015 Hi Grimm Fans, This discussion topic is “Would Juliette really have killed Nick?” Yes. From the NBC recaps you will find: 1. Juliette used her hexenbiest power to kill Jonah by causing his head to explode. See 4.10. Yes she is deadly. 2. Juliette expressed her desire to kill Adelind. She attempted to kill Adelind in the big fight scene, 4.13. Then she tried to murder Adelind using using Telekinesis to smash her with a gargoyle, 4.17. Both attempts failed. 3. In 4.20 Juliette tries to Murder Monroe using Telekinesis to force Nick to fire his gun for what she hoped to be fatal. Hank shoved Monroe away and the bullet misses. 4. She plotted the murder of several innocent neighbors and had a significant role in the murder of Nick’s mother, 4.20. All were brutally murdered, 4.21. Juliette never shows ant remorse. 5. So when Nick yields to Juliette in the battle to death in 4.22 the hexenbiest (Juliett) stands over him, claws out and arm held high ready to rip out his throat. She says “goodbye Nick.” --- Now remove Trubel from the remainder… With nothing to stop her, Juliette strikes Nick until she is certain he is dead, mutilates him for good measure, decapitates him and puts Nick’s head in the box with Kelly’s. No more Nick and no more Grimm shows on Friday night. Fortunately, Trubel does intervene. As Nick directed, Trubel kills Juliette with two well-placed crossbow bolts to her chest. There will be a Season 5, Hooray! New Guy RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - irukandji - 06-16-2015 I'll just say this. Juliette would not have killed Nick. Nick is dead and Juliette did kill him - izzy - 06-16-2015 When you are twenty your see the world one way, when you are thirty another, by the time you have hit your 5th decade time has forced a sort of wisdom upon you simply because you have seen so much. If Grimm in any way models real life, Juliette has in fact killed Nick. the Nick that was, will never be again. This event is one of those life altering events, the Nick that was is no more. He will be transformed by this experience, and likely the transformation will not be for the good. He will be bitter, angry, even more cynical, he will care less for the opinion of others and be more callous and jaundice, his compassion will take a fatal blow. The softer side of Nick will have died, the compassionate side that was Nick will no longer be. And that was the old Nick, a compassionate man,now he will be a shell of that man, as he morphs into a new Nick, a more cynical bastard, one still capable of great good, but one less willing to a stick his neck out for stranger. He will wall up his compassion and it will now only exist fro his child. He will never again let a woman in as deep as Juliette. That is reality...I have seen it time and again. RE: Would Juliette really have killed Nick? - Hexenadler - 06-17-2015 (06-16-2015, 10:04 PM)izzy Wrote: When you are twenty your see the world one way, when you are thirty another, by the time you have hit your 5th decade time has forced a sort of wisdom upon you simply because you have seen so much. A lot of that can also depend on who you are, don't you think? |