Grimm Forum
Diana - Printable Version

+- Grimm Forum (https://grimmforum.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Grimm Universe (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Grimm-Universe)
+--- Forum: Characters (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Characters)
+--- Thread: Diana (/Thread-Diana)



RE: Diana - FaceInTheCrowd - 01-27-2017

Sean has always been a vengeful, murderous kind of guy when someone ruined his plans. He had his brother blown up just for trying to steal his pet Grimm.


RE: Diana - brandon - 01-27-2017

Yes. I agree.


RE: Diana - StrangeGirl - 01-27-2017

(01-27-2017, 02:50 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: Sean has always been a vengeful, murderous kind of guy when someone ruined his plans. He had his brother blown up just for trying to steal his pet Grimm.

Yes! But we could never really trust him. True, he has helped us out in the past, but when it came down to important information... no. Everyone is saying and noticing how much Sean has changed, but he really hasn't.........


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-27-2017

From my perspective, none of the characters in Grimm has any room to point fingers and accuse anyone else of being more evil. You could counter every rotten thing Sean has done with an equivalent rotten thing done by Nick. That's the way the series has to be. Otherwise it would be completely out of balance and make no sense.


RE: Diana - brandon - 01-27-2017

Some things Rachel said are very annoying."I like children" or that Diana was going to love-ja.ja-.
Is like when the father has a new partner and tells his children that they should love their girlfriend.
Nobody can force you to do something like this.Maybe if there is tension between Nick and Adalind,by Diana.
Nick has her own rules and as she lives under her roof should do so,likes it or does not like it.
And Adalind is a mother who has not spoken clearly about it.


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-27-2017

I don't think Diana should be forced to live under Nick's roof. He's nothing to her.


RE: Diana - FaceInTheCrowd - 01-27-2017

At this point, Diana wants both her parents in her life. She's tried twice - unsuccessfully - to bring them together, and now they're going to live apart. It'll be up to Adalind to make clear to Diana that if she were to kill Nick, Mommy wouldn't go back to live with Daddy even if Daddy offered to stock the house with pottery so she could send it flying at his head every day. So Diana will the same choice as every other child with separate parents - live with one or the other or go back and forth.


RE: Diana - brandon - 01-27-2017

The main thing is to accept Nick as his mother's partner.


RE: Diana - degrimm - 01-27-2017

(01-26-2017, 09:18 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: [quote='irukandji' pid='42671' dateline='1485488067']
Sean isn't transferring his hatred of Nick to baby Kelly. He's the one who said he would take Kelly as his own.
(01-26-2017, 09:18 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Sean said that before he meet with Nick and found out that Nick wanted Kelly back and Nick did not want to "join" BC without Kelly. Sean then put Kelly on TV and said the child was his. After that Nick did whatever it took to get his son back and that is when the hate between the two men starting happening.

U know what it's so so much funny how u guys were so quick to remove any fragment of blame from adalind when she was doing sean bidding.
Sean definitely never said he was transferring hatred of Nick to the child. Sean never threatened or blackmail adalind into coming to leave with him, Bonaparte and diana did.
It wasn't cos of the hatred of nick he presented kelly as his dad to the world.


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-27-2017

(01-27-2017, 07:00 AM)brandon Wrote: The main thing is to accept Nick as his mother's partner.

No, the main thing is for Adalind to reconnect with her daughter and to put her children first. Nick shouldn't be in the equation at all and should stay out of it all together until he is asked to participate.