(01-03-2019, 01:01 PM)syscrash Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Adalind had no clue about Kenneth's plans to disclose to Nick.
You did see the scene in the hotel where Kenneth asked Adalind what she thinks Juliette would do if she knew Adalind was having Nick baby. It was when she left Kenneth and went to Nick in the police station. Also how can you say she did not know the plan. She went to kidnap Juliette. Kenneth and Victor had the same plan. There was a conversation before they came to Portland about the plan. If it is in te show it can't be made up. She may not have known the details of how Kenneth was going to execute the plan. But that does not mean she did not know they planed to get Diana from Kelly. Remember Nick did not know they knew Kelly had Diana. That is the important information I feel Adalind should have told Nick. Te key part of kidnapping Diana was to hide who had Diana.
What plan are you talking about? Yea we all knew the Royals were in Portland to get Diana back. Everyone involved knew that including Nick, the gang and your darling Juliette knew when she repulsed Adalind's attack in her home. Son, even the flocking dog, I do not own, knew they were there to get Diana. I want to know from you, what part of the plan did Kenneth discussed with Adalind.
Was it the plan that even Kenneth didn't even know yet? When Adalind was staying in the hotel suite. Is that the plan you are talking about? The plan that was completely conceived by Juliette. Sure Kenneth gave her the idea to contact Kelly, but he had no clue and neither did Adalind know of Juliette ability to contact her.
So Mr. "writers intent", Please explain how Adalind would know what Juliette would do before she was bailed out of jail. Before Kenneth even met Juliette. Please explain, I am all ears. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but your BS of changing the facts might pass as factual to a handful of delusional viewers but it falls on deaf ears to most of us.
Quote:You do remember Bonaparte? You know, the guy that kicked the crap out of Juliette.
yes bonapart stabbed Eve. But before that point she tossed him around the room several time. Compared to his only once sending her sliding across the room once.
Keep on making excuses to your harts content. In the end she was fatally injured. She would have died if it wasn't for the HERO OF THE SHOW, Nick, Not Juliette. Spin it, flip it, turn it around, all you want. In the end, SHE GOT HER ASS KICKED.
Quote:3rd, If your favorite Wesen were all so powerful why weren't they in charge of the Wesen Council? The European Union, The world, for that matter. Why did BC, with a founding member Bonaparte need the help of the rest of the Wesen world and Grimms, to take control of the world? Which, by the way, they kept failing at it.
That is a question that would take your understand how groups come to power. How wars where fought. Remember democratic rule is a very new concept. For centuries power was only achieved through one group fighting the other group.
You are asking me if I understand how groups work? A better question is; Do you even understand what you are writing? You just admitted with your own words, these Hex's aren't powerful enough to win on their own, a day after you went on a rant on how powerful they are. Make up your mind son. Please, try to be consistent with your self instead of debating your self.
Quote: Henrietta warning Juliette about leaving evidence.
When Henrietta said they used to burn witches. That is a direct reference to the Salem witch trials. You do know how and why those trials existed. You do know curing someone could have gotten you accused of being a witch. You also know that did not stop people from curing ailments. To answer your question about evidence would require your having knowledge of how people during those times continued to practiced medicine and not get accused. You also have to remember back then practicing medicine was based on superstition and considered magical.
Here you go again debating yourself. Wasn't it you claiming how Juliette could cover her ass easily in the bar or the police station if she chose to do so? You are the one to bring up the Salem witch hunts. I am not an expert on that part of history, but as you just posted, they were burned with less evidence that Juliette would have left or left in the bar.
Lucky for her she did what she did in Portland USA in the 21st Century. I think, even a delusional mind as yours would be able to comprehend. If Juliette did what she did in that pub, back in those days, she would be dead.
Quote:Also, how is that Hex/Grimm kill count coming along?
Just like KD ratiio in first person shooters does not make you the better player. Hex / Grimm kill count does not define which is stronger. Like in video games it is how you get the kills. When judging Hex vs Grimm kills, as viewers we don't have all the information. Also the writers sacrifices logic to bridge events or drive the story. For one do all hexenbiest have the ability to move things like Eve and Diana. Where the writers sacrifice logic is if hexenbiest can through people why throw punches. Take Juliette and Adalind they trow each other around the room trowing only a few punches. With Adalind and Nick it was hand to hand combat. Not a single use of magic.Even with Kelly and Catherine not once did Catherine use magic against her. There is a big breakdown in logic during the Eve and Bonapart fight. Why try and dodge the glass instead of stopping the glass. Also why where they swinging at each other, causing her to make those gymnastic moves. Here is another writer contradiction. They have Eve takeout and entire warehouse in less then a minute. But then have this massive fight in the police station. Why not have her do what she did at the factory. That is why when you use these illogical examples to try an make a point about hexenbiest being weaker. It makes your argument illogical. I choose to see a show from the view of if a character does something, that defines that ability. When later they don't use it when they could or should have. I see that as writers putting story over logic. I do not see it as a limit of the characters ability. Logic says if a character can move objects with great accuracy. If they can kill from a distance. Then how would you ever defeat them. Grimm characters are not defined as immortal. Tehy are not defined as all seeing, even though it is stated they can sense others. But being defeated because a character is distracted or blindsided does not make them a weaker character.
OMG, talk about diarrhea of the mouth or in this case, your fingers. Again, spin it, flip it, turn it around to your hearts content. You talk about logic yet you deny "REALITY". So, let me be your logical reality check. More Hex got killed that Grimms. That is a FACT, NOT MY OPINION! If the writers used your logic the show wouldn't existed. You see, the show is a flocking fantasy. There is no flocking logic to be applied, IN A FLOCKING FANTASY. CAPISCE BACCALA?
If logic is so crucial to your argument, please explain why Superman, born on Krypton gets all kinds of powers on Earth. I don't care of all the explanations the Superman writers can come up with. Logic is not applicable because, like Grimm, it is a FLOCKING FANTASY!
THERE IS NO LOGIC IN FANTASIES. IF THERE WAS LOGIC, IT WOULD BE PHYSICS, NOT FANTASIES!
(01-03-2019, 03:21 PM)N_grimm Wrote: [ -> ] (01-02-2019, 10:16 PM)dicappatore Wrote: [ -> ]N, if you need to explain this to anyone, why even bother?
I know it’s pointless, I know...
I came up with the concept a while back but I think it was Henry that posted the video. This is the one I found, not the same one he originally posted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nsd42PFyoo0