Grimm Forum

Does anyone want to take a wild guess what'll happen if she finds out?

Not good things.

Actually nothing. The show will not even bring it up again. For one the show went out of it's way to absolve Juliette. Second beased on the fact. Adalind would be just as culpable as Juliette would be. Third the show has never had past actions effect current situations.

(02-18-2017, 01:11 PM)syscrash Wrote: [ -> ]For one the show went out of it's way to absolve Juliette.

Yeah, uh...no it didn't. If the show wanted to "absolve" Juliette, the writers would have put together an episode by now where Juliette is kidnapped and placed on trial by relatives of the neighbors who were slaughtered on the night she sold Kelly out to the Royals. Or at the very least, she would have been haunted by visions of Kelly's decapitated head, the same way Renard was haunted by Meisner.

G&K simply cooked up a ridiculous persona for Juliette to hide behind so she could conveniently project her own crimes away from herself. It was a stupid, insulting idea, and I still want to punch them both for it.

(02-18-2017, 01:46 PM)Hexenadler Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-18-2017, 01:11 PM)syscrash Wrote: [ -> ]For one the show went out of it's way to absolve Juliette.

Yeah, uh...no it didn't. If the show wanted to "absolve" Juliette, the writers would have put together an episode by now where Juliette is kidnapped and placed on trial by relatives of the neighbors who were slaughtered on the night she sold Kelly out to the Royals. Or at the very least, she would have been haunted by visions of Kelly's decapitated head, the same way Renard was haunted by Meisner.

G&K simply cooked up a ridiculous persona for Juliette to hide behind so she could conveniently project her own crimes away from herself. It was a stupid, insulting idea, and I still want to punch them both for it.

Diana: “Sometimes I miss my other mommy too. Her name is Kelly just like my brother’s. You know her, don’t you? I don’t know where she is anymore, do you?”

Grimm: Top Quotes from Blind Love (Season 6 Episode 7)

Quote:Yeah, uh...no it didn't. If the show wanted to "absolve" Juliette, the writers would have put together an episode by now where Juliette is kidnapped and placed on trial by relatives of the neighbors who were slaughtered on the night she sold Kelly out to the Royals. Or at the very least, she would have been haunted by visions of Kelly's decapitated head, the same way Renard was haunted by Meisner.

For one there was never a conversation about killing Kelly. Two the writers put her upstairs when Kenneth killed her. They also had Nick Kill Kenneth for his moms death. The end of the season they had Juliette state she did not know. Plus they gave Nick a chance to kill her but he did not.
After five years and all of the things the characters have done. You can not name one character that was absolved using your definition. They show absolves the characters by giving them a reason and then ignoring something happened.
You want Juliette to be punished. Problem none of the main characters on the show has ever been punished for anything.

(02-18-2017, 02:02 PM)syscrash Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:Yeah, uh...no it didn't. If the show wanted to "absolve" Juliette, the writers would have put together an episode by now where Juliette is kidnapped and placed on trial by relatives of the neighbors who were slaughtered on the night she sold Kelly out to the Royals. Or at the very least, she would have been haunted by visions of Kelly's decapitated head, the same way Renard was haunted by Meisner.

For one there was never a conversation about killing Kelly. Two the writers put her upstairs when Kenneth killed her. They also had Nick Kill Kenneth for his moms death. The end of the season they had Juliette state she did not know. Plus they gave Nick a chance to kill her but he did not.
After five years and all of the things the characters have done. You can not name one character that was absolved using your definition. They show absolves the characters by giving them a reason and then ignoring something happened.
You want Juliette to be punished. Problem none of the main characters on the show has ever been punished for anything.

Adalind lost her daughter for years and and Meisner was haunted. Juliette saying she is sorry to Diana or Nick about Kelly is possible with this show.

syscrash is right about there being no punishments on the series. There are occasionally consequences, when someone's clever scheme blows up in his or her face (most of Adalind's clever schemes did, and this week we saw Grossante's, although there was nothing especially clever about his), but the closest thing we've ever seen to punishment was Nick killing Kenneth, and even that was more of a duel than an execution.

The show putting Nick and Adalind together proves. There is nothing you can do on this show that will have consequences. When ADalind wanted Nick to get his mom to help find Diana. The show even had Adalind say it was her fault that his mom killed her mom.
Adalind came to the house with Diana. One minute Juliette wants to kill her. The next minute Juliette is helping her.
They spend two seasons giving Nick reasons to hate Sean. In one episode Sean give Nick the key back and all is OK.

That is why I makes no sense how so many can go on an on about Juliette's actions. And how she should be punished. But ignore everyone else actions.

(02-18-2017, 02:02 PM)syscrash Wrote: [ -> ]For one there was never a conversation about killing Kelly. Two the writers put her upstairs when Kenneth killed her. They also had Nick Kill Kenneth for his moms death. The end of the season they had Juliette state she did not know. Plus they gave Nick a chance to kill her but he did not.
After five years and all of the things the characters have done. You can not name one character that was absolved using your definition. They show absolves the characters by giving them a reason and then ignoring something happened.
You want Juliette to be punished. Problem none of the main characters on the show has ever been punished for anything.

That's not an argument, syscrash. I could say, "This character's an idiot," and you'd respond, "Well, they're ALL idiots!" It's not even an excuse. It's just trying to justify hackwork with more hackwork.