05-28-2014, 06:53 PM
(05-28-2014, 05:20 PM)Hyndara Wrote:(05-28-2014, 12:07 PM)wfmyers1207 Wrote: I think the point you're missing is who decapitated the rogue FBI agent at the house? The cops are going to want to know and will be all over the place with a fine toothed comb.
That was Trubel. Not Nick. so, IF he would questioned after the forensics had *probably* taken fingerprints to find Trubel's - IF Trubel's fingerprints ARE in AFIS, he could tell that he didn't know. He wasn't at home. Again: no reason to suspend him
Quote:And Truble busted into the wedding ceremony bleeding and with blood on her clothes. Those people know her only as a grimm and were ready to tear her apart, now they're going to cover for her and lie to the cops if questioned? I don't think so. Monroe's parents and Bud might do it, but why would the rest of them?
They didn't know Trubel's name, they didn't realize she was coming for Nick. Nobody can really relate her to him. That he, And Monroe, And Rosalee, And Juliette, And Hank left the room with her could also because Nick and Hank are cops trying to take the all bloody and probably violent girl, that just busted into the ceremony, into costudy.
I mean, we are talking Grimm here. Even with the old writers-team there were flaws in the proceduals of the story. It's not CSI or Law&Order or something like that.
I think the point you are missing is that the writer's can only take the "suspension of disbelief" so far before it becomes a farce. Yes, it is a fantasy/police procedual program. But, if they take it to far it might as well be a Mel Brooks film: "Grimm - Men In Tights"