(04-20-2017, 05:16 PM)irukandji Wrote:No, some go out of their not to be subversive, while other are out of self preservation and other are probably because it's in their nature. There are different wesen who are driven by very different impulses.(04-20-2017, 05:12 PM)rpmaluki Wrote:(04-20-2017, 04:26 PM)irukandji Wrote: I wanted to move this over here, since it really doesn't apply to the Adalind-rape-thread.Are you referring to the kehrseite societal bounds because wesen were often shown subverting kehrseite social norms and laws to follow their own? I think the most wesen refrained from breaking the law in order to avoid prison not because they believed in those laws and were content to follow them when it clashed with their tradition. Blutbaden hunt kehrseite (which is not following kehrseite social boundaries) because it's in their nature, Monroe is the only one in his family or maybe even in his entire species to forsake that lifestyle. There's three different species on this show, Grimm, wesen and kehrseite because the last one lives in ignorance of the other two, concessions are made by the first two to keep it that way but they aren't bound by the rules determined by an ignorant group. They have maintained a sort of balance between following their own principles determined by their own species as well as living under the laws of the kehrseite, adhering to those laws but also breaking them according to their needs. It would have been impossible for Nick and Adalind to raise Diana and Kelly to strictly following social boundaries of the kehrseite when no wesen or Grimm in their world has ever done that nor could they ever do that, their nature is simply too radically different to the kehrseite. The Grimm universe is supposedly more violent and gruesome than our own simply because of the existence of wesen and Grimms and that dictates making room for a different set of societal bounds and to take into consideration those peripheral groups of people and what they consider the norm which will likely fall outside of the kehrseite societal boundaries.
I'm not sure if this is really a politically correct issue, I think it might be because it's infringing on others' rights.
Should Nick and Adalind have visited their twisted notions of killing and murder on Diana and Nick or should they have attempted to raise them within the bounds of society just like everyone else?
Maybe if wesen and Grimms came out of the shadows and reform the system and expand those acceptable boundaries to accommodate wesen and Grimms, there could be a new normal that's not prejudiced against any of the three species and maybe then could it be possible to raise Diana and Kelly the "right way" under those conditions than when the system is skewed favorably towards one specific group out of three.
Are you saying 100% of the wesen population is subversive?
(04-20-2017, 05:19 PM)izzy Wrote:They could try but I think Nick is followed his aunt's direction to protect the weak and hunt the bad ones.(04-20-2017, 04:26 PM)irukandji Wrote: I wanted to move this over here, since it really doesn't apply to the Adalind-rape-thread.
I'm not sure if this is really a politically correct issue, I think it might be because it's infringing on others' rights.
Should Nick and Adalind have visited their twisted notions of killing and murder on Diana and Nick or should they have attempted to raise them within the bounds of society just like everyone else?
Clearly they should attempt to raise them within the bounds of conventional society.