01-10-2019, 05:15 PM
Quote:No, that’s actually not self preservation, self preservation would be Adalind trying to head for the hils with the kids as she told Trubel to do while Nick fends of Zerstörer that would be self preservation.That would make real life common sense. But it was not be consistent with the character development. She was the last man standing when she charged Z, so yes that is self preservation. You can not look at it as what would a normal person do. You ahve to consider how the character is written.
Quote:she was shown in late season 2 doubting that Nick wanted her back after the way she treated himYet she did nothing to persuade him one way or the other. Second she was recovering from a spell as opposed to something effecting the relationship. Even when they realized Adalind had sleep with Nick . She did nothing to persuade him. It was not until her helping him get his powers back that the writers even addressed the issue.
Yes she had doubts but once Monroe explained it was magic like what she was suffering under. The doubt was gone. Remember it was her expressing love for him that broke the Muse;s hold. You are trying to compare actions involving magic, with actions based on a situation.
Just before the zombie episode is a good example where we can compare Nick and Juliette with Nick and Adalind. The second time he came over for dinner. Juliette was wondering if they where Ok with each other. She was wondering if he still wanted her. It was Nick who suggested that he was not hunger which lead to them sleeping together. An event followed by Juliette insistence that she no longer be left out. Compare that to Nick and Adalind with Nick being shown lying next to her thinking about their fight and not looking happy. Remember this is how the writers choose to write these two events. Who it was written has significance.
Quote:She left for the mansion because BC had her daughter hostage, she had a limited Bonaparte had threatened Nick and her children and Diana was crying for her mummy, she was in tears about leaving Nick how’s that not sincere that was all shown onscreen , you can argue your version writers Intent until the cows come home, it’s not going to change Canon.My observation is based on how it was written. The chooses the writers made to have the character do something in a certain way. You provide you rational for your reasoning. But you forget it is up to the writers. There is no more danger for her to stand and fight then there is to run. So ask yourself why did they write it that she choose to run.
The fact the Adalind left a note saying she was protecting them, Claire Coffee also said that’s what her character was doing , I’ll ask once again who died and made you master of what the writers meant that you know even more than the actors.
OK when I say sleeping together i am referring to having sex. They are shown only twice to have had sex. Yes they are shown in bed together but nothing indicates they had sex. But this is one of those things we seem to see it difference. looking at the episodes you sight. You seem to think, two people what seem to be naked in bed means they had sex, i don't. And since the writers make a point at certain time to indicate sex. It makes no sense to assume the other times involved sex. Again you are taking a position of what a person would do. You still ignore what the writer wrote or did not write. if the writer meant to imply sex on all those times, why wouldn't they write something that implies sex. Even the times you sight they are naked in bed indicating they had seek is not conclusive. It is shown neither sleeps in very much, so sleeping naked would be consistent with what is shown. FYI couples, roommates, partners sleep naked and it has nothing to do with sex. And considering this show has a very progressive outlook on sex. Why would sleeping naked imply sex.
As for the kisses. I look at the passion written into the scene. With other couples there is without a doubt passion being expressed something not written into the scenes with Nick and Adalind. That's not to say the kisses do not reflect an infatuation with each other, because they do.
Other then their second dinner and getting his powers back Nick and Juliette are never shown as having sex. But all the times Nick and Juliette are shown together in and out of bed he is never shown to have concerns or apprehension like he is shown to have with Adalind. The frequency that Nick and Adalind are shown together and how they write Nick response, Is another indication of the point the writers are making. We see how the writers show a couple in love, why not show the same actions for Nick and Adalind if being in love was the intent. Instead you argue the nuisance of there actions to prove your point. Where I argue the specificity of how and action is written to prove intent.
Example the statue. Because Adalind was pushed out of the way that proves Juliette was trying to kill her and missed. I look at how her response was written and see intimidation instead of intent. The same is true with the spice shop. That one is even more obvious, that her response was written to show she was not trying to kill. Even if they did show Hank pushed Monroe out of the way.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one