11-20-2018, 07:04 AM
(11-20-2018, 06:56 AM)irukandji Wrote:(11-20-2018, 06:46 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(11-20-2018, 05:45 AM)irukandji Wrote:(11-20-2018, 05:37 AM)Henry of green Wrote: Also your a big assumption claiming she’d be tainted if anything Grimm blood would make her more valuable not less, Royals valued Grimm ability to tame Wesen and seemed very interested in possessing Grimms much more than they did hexenbiests.
But here's the thing. Royals didn't mingle their blood with the grimms. It's only you who's coming up with this because it make Diana a product of Nick and Adalind. That isn't the case. If royal blood was of no consequence, then the series wouldn't have even bothered testing the baby.
It was the royal blood that made her special. If she were tainted with grimm blood, they would not want her. She would not be a true royal in their eyes.
I never once stated she was a product of Nick and Adalind her father is a Royal it’s established Canon and unlike you I don’t argue against Canon, unlike some I don’t make up paternity debates when there’s non to be had.
If this is simply speculation, why are you so adamant about it?
I never once claimed it was anything but speculation.