03-12-2018, 04:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018, 07:39 PM by dicappatore.)
(03-12-2018, 03:22 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:I will give you the benefit of the doubt and lets say, to hide ownership, he did put the land under her name and i forgot the scene when it was stated. Owning the land and even the trailer and putting the trailer on fire is still arson and unlawful. I don't know where you live, obviously, you are unfamiliar with your fire codes.It is not illegal to destroy your own property. Take a house. as long as the bank does not own it you can bull doze it or do what ever you want. To burn it, the crime is not arson unless you are trying to claim the insurance. The crime would be endangering the properties next to the house. Because the trailer fire was in the forest. There could be a crime of endangering the forest because of the uncontrolled fire.
But being unlawful is not true. For a fact I have vacant land in the Mohave desert. I let a guy put his trailer out there. He paid rent for about two years then all of a sudden stopped paying. after being unable to contact him. the trailer was mine. For fun I blow it up. The only problem the city had was they made me clean up the mess. Using that real life experience. the difference with Juliette is she did not declare the property abandoned. But the writers solved that problem by defining the trailer as something that could not be known. This means since Nick could never clam the trailer. he could never depute that the trailer was not Juliette's. Now this does cause a problem with the wesen council. Because now she was be guilty of causing a situation that would expose their secrete when it is investigate why a trailer is burning in the woods and they look inside. But even that problem was solved by Next and Hank removing all wesen evidence.
Even though this removes the problem with the council with the council. It does not open up Nick's ability to fill charges because he impeded the crime scene by removing evidence that could lead to determining how and why the fire was started. The writers where pretty good at covering their bases on the problems caused with how they removed the trailer.
Which is why I find it funny how people keep wanting to try and prove something that the writers have made a point of creating a loop hole to excuse an action. Lets take Mari death. We assume it was either Adalind or Sean that sent the reapers. The fact is the writers never actual stated who sent them. This left each character with and excuse of plausible denial. Even though the writers had both character admit they where involved with trying to kill Kelly's sister. But even that the writers provided an excuse buy framing it in the context of a wesen going after a Grimm because of the key. Something perfectly acceptable in the wesen community. Even Kelly was shown to understand and accept that reasoning.
You know, this post just proves that you are an idiot. If you think starting a fire in a wooded area is the same as bulldozing your own house, proves you are just stupid or a kid masquerading as an adult.
Better yet, take a walk to your local firehouse and tell them the same and see what their response is. Even better, find a forest firefighter and see what his response will be.
BTW, genius, before you bulldoze a house, in most municipalities, you need a permit. If you use any kind of explosive, even in Class 3 devices states, the ATF would be all over you. I guess I must have missed that part of the show when Juliette gets a permit to torch her trailer in a wooded area of the state of Oregon.
Time to stop wasting my time and ignore pure stupidity!
Came back to add this. If what I posted above gets me kicked off the forum, SO BE IT. If this forum will keep flocking idiots like this moron, not knowing the dangers of what a forest fires can do and the danger they pose to the men and women who fight to put them out? Then this forum is not worth it.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!