(03-09-2016, 06:57 AM)irukandji Wrote: But New Guy, none of what you wrote conclusively proves Juliette premeditated and carried out Kelly's murder. Nothing you wrote proves she was lying to Nick. Plausibility, feelings, whatever you think is interesting, but it still comes down to this. You don't have proof and you're still just guessing.Hi Irukandji,
The decapitated body of Kelly Burkhardt has been located. The evidence of homicide should be unquestionable. So in Grimm, Nick is the judge, jury and executioner.
You are correct. Juliette has not provided a confession that she willingly participated in Kelly's murder. There is no "eye witness" to her crime. She has provided nothing at all to prove she could not have known Kenneth's intention. The "proof" of her guilt is by "weight of evidence" or "preponderance of the evidence." These are evidential facts:
Quote:1. Kenneth got Hexenette on board to complete a mission.There are more facts that could be presented as evidence of her GUILT.
2. Hexenette agreed to betray Kelly, lie about Nick's danger, and lure her to the house.
3.The planning of the mission occurred in the hotel.
4. Hexenette participated in those plans.
5. The mission included the abduction of Diana.
6. Hexenette used Nick's computer to send the email to Kelly containing lies to lure her back to Portland.
7. Hexenette came to Nick's house with Kenneth to bait Kelly.
8. Hexenette again lied to Kelly when she arrived and lured her into the house.
9. Hexenette heard the brutal murder. {Side note - She showed no expression, as if ok, sounds like Kenneth got it (Kelly's murder) done.}
10. She did nothing to stop it.
11. She took Diana to the car and drove to the Royal compound with the blood stained Kenneth.
11. After the helicopter left, Hexenette returned to the scene of the crime and attempted to murder Nick.
What facts can you provide that she is innocent?
New Guy