12-08-2015, 09:46 AM
(12-08-2015, 06:23 AM)irukandji Wrote: ...I have wondered this very thing and I think it was discussed in Spells and Potions. I personally don't think the spell was some kind of illusion. I think Adalind actually became "another Juliette" for that while, and vice versa. The baby was a product of Nick and "the other" Juliette's union. Would it have carried back over once Adalind transformed back into herself? You wouldn't think so, this being an enchantment, but one never knows.
(11-26-2015, 06:35 PM)speakeasy Wrote: ...There probably is a distinction between Adalind creating the outward appearance of Juliette to rob Nick of his Grimmness and that of Juliette taking on the outward appearance of Adalind in the process of restoring it. In the absence of knowledge to the contrary I'm still considering the idea that since Juliette did indeed retain the Hexenbiest essence - it may fair to also consider the possibility of Juliette transferring something of herself to Adalind and through her, to the child.
The prospect of the whole concept so confusing and outlandish that I've given myself a headache, like the man said, pain strikes the weakest spots first.
(12-12-2015, 01:26 PM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: interesting posts, we don't know just how much Adalind became Juliette and we don't know what Adalind with the potion that took Nick's Grimm. Now add in Grimm blood, and the potion Elizabeth made to get the Grimm back change Juliette into a hexen. This all could work, always a but I don't think the writers would gg this complex of a plot. I see why you have a headache give me one just following the plot.
Portland omelet.
"The only thing that will redeem mankind is cooperation." Bertrand Russell - printed on a beer mat in "Shaun of The Dead".