i think the whole point of season 5 and ending of season 4 is a desperate move on the part of the writers- to get us believing adalind was actually a good person (despite her bad reputation which we should relate to her mum) and that she wont necessarily/unnecessarily kill someone even if she has the power to do so and vice versa for juliette that for all the good she has in her, she has a potential to be bad, if given a power to get back at anyone-- why so so much more emphasis is kept on her trying to kill a baby and her association in killing their house neigbhors unnecessary and nick' mum.
that's them telling us adalind has a better morality high ground than juliette. but the writers forget that this is a seasonal show and not a one season/one episode show.
i remember when nick tried keep up morality high ground with sean renard for killing a man and sean told him he has been killing people so how is that different.
Same morality high ground he had with juliette in the station where he had a conflict with juliette about attiitude towards killing a baby.
i wont be surprised if juliette would be the one to betray nick again with the stick of life and adalind loyal to nick.
that's them telling us adalind has a better morality high ground than juliette. but the writers forget that this is a seasonal show and not a one season/one episode show.
i remember when nick tried keep up morality high ground with sean renard for killing a man and sean told him he has been killing people so how is that different.
Same morality high ground he had with juliette in the station where he had a conflict with juliette about attiitude towards killing a baby.
i wont be surprised if juliette would be the one to betray nick again with the stick of life and adalind loyal to nick.