Grimm Forum
Diana - Printable Version

+- Grimm Forum (https://grimmforum.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Grimm Universe (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Grimm-Universe)
+--- Forum: Characters (https://grimmforum.com/forum/Forum-Characters)
+--- Thread: Diana (/Thread-Diana)



RE: Diana - jsgrimm45 - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:36 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:32 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny how people can see the same thing and come away with a different idea. Not for most of your post but for one I saw Sean planting the idea that Nick would or might hurt Adalind to gage what she would do and he got the answer he hoped for Nick's death.

I would agree with you if that was the only thing Sean questioned. But Sean also went into some detail to find out exactly what part Diana had in Conrad's death. Diana was firm in her responses that it was Sean who killed Conrad.
I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:36 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:32 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny how people can see the same thing and come away with a different idea. Not for most of your post but for one I saw Sean planting the idea that Nick would or might hurt Adalind to gage what she would do and he got the answer he hoped for Nick's death.

I would agree with you if that was the only thing Sean questioned. But Sean also went into some detail to find out exactly what part Diana had in Conrad's death. Diana was firm in her responses that it was Sean who killed Conrad.
I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.

It is really funny how we see things. I didn't get the impression that Sean came to the conclusion it was Diana. It seemed to me he was still unsure.


RE: Diana - Kathryn Wooten - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:46 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:36 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:32 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny how people can see the same thing and come away with a different idea. Not for most of your post but for one I saw Sean planting the idea that Nick would or might hurt Adalind to gage what she would do and he got the answer he hoped for Nick's death.

I would agree with you if that was the only thing Sean questioned. But Sean also went into some detail to find out exactly what part Diana had in Conrad's death. Diana was firm in her responses that it was Sean who killed Conrad.
I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.

It is really funny how we see things. I didn't get the impression that Sean came to the conclusion it was Diana. It seemed to me he was still unsure.

It seems Sean wanted Diana to tell him, she had a hand in Bonapart demise,,,but also he was timid to provoke her into telling him that she did it through him
Why Diana did not tell him straight out is a mystery


RE: Diana - jsgrimm45 - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:51 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:46 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:36 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:32 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny how people can see the same thing and come away with a different idea. Not for most of your post but for one I saw Sean planting the idea that Nick would or might hurt Adalind to gage what she would do and he got the answer he hoped for Nick's death.

I would agree with you if that was the only thing Sean questioned. But Sean also went into some detail to find out exactly what part Diana had in Conrad's death. Diana was firm in her responses that it was Sean who killed Conrad.
I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.

It is really funny how we see things. I didn't get the impression that Sean came to the conclusion it was Diana. It seemed to me he was still unsure.

It seems Sean wanted Diana to tell him, she had a hand in Bonapart demise,,,but also he was timid to provoke her into telling him that she did it through him
Why Diana did not tell him straight out is a mystery
Funny again because I seen her telling him straight out she did and why.


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:55 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny again because I seen her telling him straight out she didn't and why.

And here raises the question of whether a child of Diana's true age (3 years), could learn to develop the fine art of lying. Was she telling the truth or lying to Renard?


RE: Diana - Kathryn Wooten - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:55 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:51 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:46 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:36 AM)irukandji Wrote: I would agree with you if that was the only thing Sean questioned. But Sean also went into some detail to find out exactly what part Diana had in Conrad's death. Diana was firm in her responses that it was Sean who killed Conrad.
I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.

It is really funny how we see things. I didn't get the impression that Sean came to the conclusion it was Diana. It seemed to me he was still unsure.

It seems Sean wanted Diana to tell him, she had a hand in Bonapart demise,,,but also he was timid to provoke her into telling him that she did it through him
Why Diana did not tell him straight out is a mystery
Funny again because I seen her telling him straight out she didn't and why.
But she would be lying, was Diana afraid of daddy not liking her if she told him the truth?


RE: Diana - jsgrimm45 - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:57 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:55 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Funny again because I seen her telling him straight out she did and why.

And here raises the question of whether a child of Diana's true age (3 years), could learn to develop the fine art of lying. Was she telling the truth or lying to Renard?
There was a typo in my post was did tell him. We have some who says just because her real age is 3 she is really a 8 or 10 year old as far as maturity and we know by 8 or 10 a child can lie and does.


RE: Diana - irukandji - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:58 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote: But she would be lying, was Diana afraid of daddy not liking her if she told him the truth?

We don't really know that she is lying, do we?


RE: Diana - jsgrimm45 - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 08:58 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:55 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:51 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:46 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: I also took that scene as Sean now knows it was her moving his hand, because she seen what happened.

It is really funny how we see things. I didn't get the impression that Sean came to the conclusion it was Diana. It seemed to me he was still unsure.

It seems Sean wanted Diana to tell him, she had a hand in Bonapart demise,,,but also he was timid to provoke her into telling him that she did it through him
Why Diana did not tell him straight out is a mystery
Funny again because I seen her telling him straight out she did and why.
But she would be lying, was Diana afraid of daddy not liking her if she told him the truth?
Sorry a typo was to be did tell him.


RE: Diana - Kathryn Wooten - 01-28-2017

(01-28-2017, 09:04 AM)irukandji Wrote:
(01-28-2017, 08:58 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote: But she would be lying, was Diana afraid of daddy not liking her if she told him the truth?

We don't really know that she is lying, do we?

We all saw when Dian stuck the hat pin in the doll ..Sean stuck the sword into Conrad....unless I am missing something Diana is lying

Also I wish Sean would have asked why he Killed Conrad??